I was commenting on
http://bit.ly/68rs Going to muse on yarn as that's what I use, even though I don't make children's things.
As for
http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia09/brief/leadlimits.pdf:Most yarn undergo chemicals and processing, so one would still have to prove that whatever was done to the yarn is safe. Tricky, bamboo , for instance, soes through a heck of a process to become yarn, not environmentally friendly at all.
Hmmm, so for instance:
Lion Brand Collection Organic Wool Yarn is described as thus:
Article # 481
It is 100% organically produced wool and dyed with low impact dyes, certified according to Global Organic Textile Standards by the Institute of Marketecology.
Would the certification from the Institute not be enough? Unless you're making something that involves significantly changing the makeup of the supply in question, why shouldn't that be enough?
Makes one wonder the REAL reason behind the bill. Under the auspices of protecting our children, big business (who can afford the costs) clobbering artisans and small ones out of the market?