I have been trying to make my voice heard with members of Congress with little effect beside form letters that do not begin to address the shortcomings of the CPSIA.
Last night I began to email the legislative aides to Congressmen. And I received a response that shocked me.
I have included the text of my initial email-- which I didn't find inflammatory only factual. But given his response maybe I was off base? I didn't think so but---
-------
I am writing to express my concern- and yes, outrage and frustration with the upcoming February 10 do-or die deadline of the CPSIA which was passed in August.
I have been following the CPSIA debate very closely and was pleased to hear that Waxman and Rush called a meeting on Friday of last week to request further clarification of the law. Nevertheless, the exemptions proposed do not even begin to protect artists, craftsmen, and other small businesses.
I am a stay at home mom that embroiders baby gifts. One of my most popular items is a Birthday Bib and Bloomer set.
In order to conform with the law I would need to charge $4268 instead of the $18 I currently charge my customers. Why?
The CPSIA as it now stands requires that I test each product that I embroider for lead and the presence of phthlates. Each component will cost $75 for lead testing and an additional $350 per component for phthalates tests. Since there are 10 different components and each component will need to be tested each time--
bib
velcro on the bib
bloomers
eyelet trim on bloomers
2 fabrics for the bib applique
2 fabrics for the bloomers applique
thread for the bloomers applique
thread for the bib applique
I would have to add $4250 to cover costs of testing-- TO EACH SET SOLD. So as of Feb. 10th when testing is mandated my once $18 set will cost $4268.
I am respectfully requesting that your office work to repel or amend this misguided law-- the goals were admirable but the reality is abysmal.
-------
The response from the Legislative Director of the Representative's office:
When the new world order come in tomorrow, you can express outrage. But before you get "outraged" give us a chance to do something. Otherwise REMOVE ME from any "outraged" lists. Change is coming, let it happen before you hate your government again.
----
And my calm and factual response:
Mr Cxxxxxx,
Thank you for your prompt response.
I do not hate my government. Not at all.
But I do believe I am entitled to my frustration and my outrage.
Congressman Doyle did, in fact, serve as a co-sponsor for H.R. 4040: Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008.
Sincerely Yours,
Laurel Schreiber-- Pennsylvania Resident
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Request for Advice- Recent legislation
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:00:45 -0500
From:
To:
--------------------------
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Laurel Schreiber
To: Levin, Elissa; Schepis, Christopher; Lavery, Theresa; Louer, Greg; Diffell, Brian; Ingham, Amy; Vaught, Laura; Johnson, Matt P.; Hernandez, Saul; Shapiro, Aaron; Axthelm, Rick; Plevniak, Steve; Cleveland, Scott; Smith, Jonathan; Cavanagh, Pat; Wood, Rachelle; Gaffin, Michael; Manso, Angela; Lichtenberg, Dana; Ramos, Derrick; Stack, Elizabeth; Pepper, Lori; Bahar, David; Bayer, Mark; Bidwai, Neeta; Victor, Kyle; DeBosier, Chris; Jones, Morgan; Dockham, Matthew; Wright, Tuley
Sent: Tue Jan 20 00:08:49 2009
Subject: Request for Advice- Recent legislation