craftsfromtheheart says:
How do we protect the children though? We need to have strict laws to protect those that can't protect themselves. Should the government exclude handmade items? Should we be able to only use raw materials that have been tested? It is really a catch 22.
I have seen online sellers sell items with small beads on children's clothing and accessories and I think that is so unsafe. For those that make totally safe toys and accessories for children, I applaud you, but who will regulate the rest?
**********************************
I have three kids myself (2, 7, and 10). To be honest, I think that I as a parent do a better job keeping them safe on a day-to-day level than Congress can. Watching for small parts, sharp edges, knowing which of my kids mouth things, etc. Common sense that we all of us use with our children. That said, I do agree there should be guidelines in place for harmful heavy metals and chemicals, particularly inasmuch as they pertain to items made for children (like, NONE in those items would be super).
I don't think anyone here is saying there shouldn't be any form of governance; we're asking for SMARTER governance. Most of us applaud the core of the law; big box toymakers were asleep at the wheel and a lot of dangerous items got in. It's the manner in which the regulations have been written. Inherently duplicative and prohibitively expensive testing (particularly on materials with insignificant lead) is just not efficient. As a consumer (not a seller), shouldn't I know that fabric or paint or whatever I buy to make something for my own children is safe?
While those companies at the heart of the matter will be able to continue, those of us smaller concerns will not. To be frank, my own kids are in more danger (albeit economic) as a result of these regulations.
