head2toeboutique
Unfortunately even if you have packaging from the paint manufacturer stating that their product conforms to ASTM regulations as non-toxic or lead free you still need to test now. Children's items with paint along with jewerly and certain newborn to toddler products need testing now, and where not included in the stay of testing. If the proposed draft for component testing goes though in late Jan / early Feb 2010 at that time you will be able to use a GCCs or COCs from the paint manufacturer, as long as the certificate is supported by an approved 3rd party lab. If the CPSC does allow this then we must keep records of which testing certificates went into the making of each final product.
As for proving to the government that your products are for adult use more so than for children they are going to look at several factors including how you market the product. A handpainted frame that simples says "great for children's pictures" will go through more scrutiny then one that expands it's description to something more like "prefect for displaying school pictures in your living room for your relatives to see". This type of marketing may not help you if a customer or consumer watchdog group decides your product is for children & reports it to the government, but it would help you to defend yourself that the item was intended primarily for adults as a general home decor item and not subject to CPSIA testing.
"III. Certification Based on Third-Party Testing of Children's Products
A. General Requirements for Initial Ce.rtification of Children's Products Prior to Introduction into Commerce
Section 102 ofthe CPSIA requires that children's products be tested by a CPSC recognized
third-party conformity assessment body before they are introduced into commerce. This requirement is already in force for lead in paint, small parts, cribs, pacifiers, and children's metal jewelry. All children's products to which the above regulations are applicable are already required to be tested for conformity by a CPSC recognized
third-party conformity assessment body.
Section 102(a)(2) ofthe CPSIA requires certification of children's products based on CPSC-recognized third-party conformity assessment body testing. Generally, this requirement goes into effect for products manufactured more than 90 days after the Commission publishes a notice of requirements pertaining to the accreditation oftesting laboratories to test for a particular standard. For example, the Commission published such a notice of requirements for testing to the lead paint ban of 16 CFR part 1303 on September 22,2008. The third-party testing requirement for lead paint became effective on December 22, 2008 for children's products manufactured on and after that date. If you manufacture a children's product bearing paint after that date you must have your children's product tested by a CPSC-recognized third-party conformity assessment body and then certify that thqt product complies to the lead paint standard. A list of all children's product safety rules potentially applicable to children's products is attached at Appendix B." ...
"D. Specific Laboratory Testing Practices with Regard to Component Part Testing
The Commission has received questions about certain specific laboratory techniques for testing and whether a manufacturer can use those techniques for certifying products for compliance with the lead content limits.
For example, certain children's products use tiny amounts of paint that requires CPSC-recognized third-party testing for lead. In such circumstances, many samples will have to be destroyed to collect enough paint chips to be able to test for conformity. The Commission is willing to accept certificates based on alternatives to final product testing in such circumstances so long as test methods are employed such that the test results accurately reflect the actual lead content of the paint as used on the product. Thus, it may be possible to use component testing to test the paint in this circumstance. The Commission will accept certificates based upon the paint manufacturer's test results so long as those tests have been conducted by a CPSC-recognized third-party conformity assessment body. A manufacturer certifying on the basis on the paint manufacturer's test results should obtain a copy of the results of the testing and ensure that the paint used on the product is the same in all material respects to the paint tested by the CPSC-recognized third-party assessment body and, importantly, does not contain additives such as dryers that may change the lead content of the paint. Alternatively, the manufacturer could take a sample of the paint and submit it to a CPSC-recognized third-party conformity assessment body and obtain the results directly. Either way, the key to such a certification is an acknowledgement that control processes are in place to ensure that the only paint used on the product is paint that is identical to the paint tested in all material respects.
Manufacturers who chose to rely on certifications of the paint, and not the paint as applied to the product, should keep detailed records with regard to the paint purchases and lot and batch records linking paint purchases to particular factory run to guard against inadvertent use of paint that is not the same in all material respects. Likewise, they should perform some production testing to ensure the integrity of the manufacturing process, supply chain testing and possible contamination during manufacture or assembly. To minimize the expense and number of samples destroyed to generate a sufficient number of samples for testing, manufacturers may want to arrange to intentionally over apply the paint to a fixed number of samples as the product is being produced (a process known as "spray sampling"). Then, the "spray-samples" could be separated from production units and supplied to the CPSC recognized third-party conformity assessment body, where the more abundant paint application will render sufficient paint for analysis without the destruction of a large number of production products. Similarly, if a. stamp is used to apply the paint, designated samples could be repeatedly stamped during production, also creating special samples (created along side normal production units) for analysis. These techniques, using production tooling during the normal manufacturing process, will help minimize any known or unknown factors that would tend to make the testing samples different from normal production units.
In the case of multiple colors applied to a very small area such as eye details on a doll or multiple colored sprays to create realistic skin effects, the individual paints can be certified or a composite ofthe paints certified using knowledge of the volumes and masses of the paints used to appropriately limit the lead content of any one paint color." from a proposal draft n testing & certification at
http://www.cpsc.gov/library/foia/foia10/brief/102testing.pdf