"why don't we just stop buying from China? that would solve this problem". Good point, I think."
true but not true, [sorry I don't mean to be spamming here, I really don't, its not my intent, and in case any wonder now, I am politically independent, work solely on my own, outside both the right/left/fringe boxes ok. so let me make that clear, IF you want to know more about some of what I interject here, email me, I'd be glad to share, but lets just say, I saw the effects of 'central politburo' and when I read dissenters now, I KNOW not just mentally, but I KNOW, exactly what they are saying and let me just say, the changes we are going to see are and have been working for a very long time and in ways that are so subtle, including on the internet, Especially on the internet and why I strongly suggest, read, read, and read..get your hands on everything and start reading and find out for yourself and by reading I'm talking, read past writers, esp theories/debates in 30s to 60s, on Both sides, not just one, you'll be able to connect a lot of the dots if you do this].
Ok but anyway, its NOT just China, see that's the thing,
its Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, El Salvador, Mexico, Indonesia, etc. And its not just like one factory that makes all one product, for one company, it doesn't work like that so even if, lets say you boycott China,
it won't matter because they'll just transfer production to their other 3,000 factories worldwide. In countries where yes, there is huge environmental violators and that includes lead recycling. China is at the top of pyramid, sure, but they aren't there alone. And here's where it gets really ugly,
lets say you boycott China, o.k., you put a few out, but the way it is set up, is that it hurts the workers more than it hurts the Multinationals/governments. And THIS is why, those of the cottage industry that work and do a lot for Fair Trade and Environmentalism,
are more of a threat, and why this law is a clever means in eradicating that threat. I know, many scholars/experts say, that wasn't the 'goal' and that big business will be hurt by this too,
Correct, that is correct, it doesn't just effect the cottage industry, and yes this law wasn't just some conspiracy to close down all small retailers and shops and individuals, Granted, hear the advocates on that and concur. But there ARE some, yes, who did write this law with that agenda,
kid your self not and some of that, sad to say as it is, is also due to economic necessity [looking at long term] because of the crisis with the global economy. It isn't just the US that is in trouble, our economies due to globalization are interdependent. But its the Why they are, that is where you begin to really see the culprits,
oh, sure, it was to create new markets and privitization (sic) and democracy,
its done anything But. Its created a huge gap is what its done, with more Despotic regimes increasing in power than vice versa. Or despotic forces taking over, not by bombs or violence, but by states within states, much of that feed by migrant labor which in many parts of the world was necessity as well, OR due to the results of strife/conflict in other parts of the world. [refugees especially]
Not here saying 'its the migrants', no, just explaining the Shift in global economy and domestic, and How those have been cleverly used to solidify corporatism, pitting worker against worker, etc. Throw in other forces in there and you got one hell of a mess,
and lets face it, we are in one hell of a mess. Even if, lets say we wanted to stop buying from China, the fact that there is a majority segment in This country who are barely paying mortgage/rent or who work for bare minimum, they are they ones that are paying/demanding the cheap goods, so those who boycott China, wouldn't even make a dent.
One solution is yes, Made in the USA market, no doubt, but unfortunately there is that trade deficit/debt, especially debt and so called 'agreements' for Free Trade, you know, hey, that promise for democracy,
its a double edged sword is what I'm saying. I Do think, however, that there should be some boycotts WITH a very loud message that its with solidarity for the workers who are forced to work for bread in China, against sweatshops, against trafficking of labor, etc. Against human right abuses,
and against governments usurping complete control over people and economy. Bottom line, the destruction and/or eradication of cottage industry does NOTHING to elevate workers worldwide,
it does the exact opposite. That is the message that really needs to get out. One of the arguments that the social engineers [and let me say, just for the record, the misogynists because they are extremely misogynist and anti-family],
used against cottage industry or over seas, micro development, was that those micro loans to small business development failed, because the businesses failed within a year [read this in several journals from the Balkan region to East Europe]. Most of these micro loans were given to women to combat poverty/trafficking, etc.
Well yes, they did fail, but why? Because the corrupt governments, the mafia's, the Corporations [or those in bed with the thugs] did all in their power to monopolize to where these small businesses/micro and many of them cottage industry couldn't compete, they folded, leaving so many women/communities vulnerable to exploitation.
So the anti-micro interests [and those who want mass control] said, "see, here, look, these westerners with their imperialist capitalism come in and exploit via micro loans and so forth", [and they not only use that argument on that aspect, you'd be shocked to see several so called feminist scholars and so called 'concerned for people' who are now using that same damn logic to end micro-loans and laws against sexual trafficking, that say, oh its empowerment and all that b.s., I hate them, God I hate them, they are the Worst traitors to humanity],
so, yes, I concur with you, on the need for boycott/support of cottage industry but we need more than that.
janedoethreads