From the Guide to the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) for Small Buisniesses, Resellers, Crafters and Charities,
http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.pdf , it states,
"In determining whether a consumer product is “intended primarily” for a child 12 years of age or younger, the following factors will be considered:
• A statement by the manufacturer about the intended use of the product, including a label on the product, if such statement is reasonable.
• Whether the product is represented in its packaging, display, promotion or advertising as appropriate for use by children 12 years of age or younger.
• Whether the product is commonly recognized by consumers as being intended for use by a child 12 years of age or younger.
• The Age Determination Guidelines issued by Commission staff.
If a product is intended for adults or for general use by consumers of all ages, then it is not intended primarily for children. Products marketed and priced in a manner that would not make them appropriate for use by a child would also not be intended primarily for children. An example would be an expensive telescope ‐‐ because it is sold for general use by all ages, it is not a children’s product even though it can be used by a child on occasion."
So, if my amigurumi include a statement from me that they are not intended for children, I do not promote or advertise them as toys, and they are intended for adult collectors (which might be "used by a child on occasion" but are not made with that purpose", why would it still be considered a child's product? If the manufacturers intent is irrelevant, then it should not be mentioned as a consideration at all.
This is the part of the law that I don't understand. I don't make children's products. I never have, I never plan to. But, I'm supposed to treat my items like they are just because someone else says they're for kids (when the person who makes them says they are not)? That makes no sense to me.