I placed a call…with some questions I need answered. I am happy that we have a Senator that is out there helping our cause…but
I am concerned the Demint bill does not address exempt of one of a kinds (maybe because they don’t consider OOAK an issue needing to be addressing) or very small runs.
Now I am addressing this from a garment manufacturing standpoint, because that is what I know:
I looked over The new DeMint bill/admendment needs to state not only by supplier certification approval but from the suppliers stand point it should be style # type not dyelot. Because if it is still written as dyelot and the vendor/supplier has to certify by dyelot with 3rd party testing. Then every 4000 yards give or take the vendor has to get the item 3rd party tested, Which means that means delays in fabric delivery and high prices to us the end maker.
“Style #” being (type of item, specific weight, exact content, fiber/yarn supplier stated, print type, ink type, ect ) And put the ownus on the vendor/suppler that if they change something/someone in there manufacturing chain they get the style retested, and have alternative certificate done by 3rd parties.
I know we are all very concerned with how the bills affect us directly, but we have to think how it affects our suppliers which ultimately affect us. We must protect the supply chain as well as protecting our children.
So the bill also need to state the specific in which it is tested. The original bill was created without knowing how items are produced… Lets not make mistakes in the corrections to it.