kaitiebugandme says:
"I recently decided to start my own business, but upon my research I discovered that no more than 1 gram can be used in jewelry for children under 6. (Please correct me if I understood this wrong)."
Your right and wrong at the same time. The law that allows for the 1 gram of crystal is the California Lead in Jewelry law,
http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/LeadInJewelry.cfm and
http://www.rings-things.com/jewelry-safety.html the CPSIA supercedes that law. Since the CPSIA is a federal law but gives each state's GA power to enforce & prosecute, CA's General Attorney could charge & fine you with violating both.
Nope have not seen a viable replacement for Swarovski leaded crystal though I have heard RUMORS about Swarovski expandining their cut glass, Spectra, from their chandelier line into beads. From what I've seen though on the chandelier when the true leaded crystal is next to the Spectra glass the traditional leaded crystal has a much greater brillance to it.
Unfortunately there are still plenty of businesses out there that do not know that this law applies to their products. TOO many people, businesses & consumers alike, still think that the CPSC is only about toys and baby care, they don't realize that the CPSC can have the power to regulate any product that is not under the direct & explicit regulations of another government agency and then again it can still regulate accessories to the products under another agency's domain.
Also there is a lot of of 1/2 true information being passed around like the old game of 'telephone'. One person hears there are exemptions for wood beads then tells another without passing along the fact that if you add a a finishing agent like stain, pigment, paint, or lacquer then you currently need the manufactures testing info or have it tested yourself to prove the is no lead or phthalates. Then you have the media only giving bits and pieces of the stories involving the law, again without the full backround, stating things like thrift stores and charities are exempt. Again 1/2 true they are exempt from the required 3rd party testing but not from being prosecuted & fined if any of the items they sold are later found to be above the new limits which will again be lowered in Aug 09. I suggest reading this site often to find out any offical updates & changes
http://www.cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/cpsiasbguide.html .The House, Congress, & Judiciary (sp) are the only ones that can change the CPSIA, the CPSC can only interpet what is given to them. Unless a site has .gov in it, it's just someone's interpetation of what the government has to say & may or may not be the full truth in regards to the law.
All designers that make jewelry that the government feels is primarily for children 12 & UNDER should be aware mandatory 3rd PARTY TESTING under the CPSIA for children's jewelry started MARCH 20th, 2009.
There have been updates and proposed exemptions, but they are not final, I suggest that you check Table B here fequently
http://cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/manufacturers.html#q8 since it may change suddenly if Nord steps down as acting chairperson of the CPSC.
As of right now if your items are made exclusively of materials currently exempt you will not need to retest the finished jewelry for lead, though you might need the small parts testing or warnings dependant on what age the government feels the jewelry is considered for. See TABLE A here,
http://cpsc.gov/about/cpsia/smbus/manufacturers.html#q4 for what needs testing now & what you can still sell using the raw material manufacturer's testing certifications until Feb 2010 or the appointment of a new chairperson. But once you add a single component that is not on the government approved list then the entire piece will have to be tested by a CPSC approved lab. So Sterling Silver clasp + SS crimps + silk threading + natural freshwater pearls are OK to skip the lead testing but not the small parts testing (if needed), but Sterling Silver clasp + SS crimps + silk threading + natural freshwater pearls + E6000 glue would need testing for lead as well as the small parts testing (if needed), & the only thing that changed is a drop here & there of glue was added to reinforce the knots on the silk. Again there is no clarification if any enchanced form of a natural bead will fall into the exempt item list at all, at least until there is a final ruling that has more details.
There are 34 labs listed as being here in the USA out of the 133 total, but not all of the labs can test jewelry, and all of those that can test jewelry may not be accredited to do the small parts testing if needed. Also the only approved testing method for jewelry is destructive digestive acid testing, in which they pull apart the final creative piece and bath each component in acid to see how much lead is there in each component by weight. All you get back is a report, and a bill for testing at around $75 -$100 per component, so using the example above w/ glue your testing bill would be $375 -$500 for lead testing alone. See the list of accredited labs here
http://www.cpsc.gov/cgi-bin/labapplist.aspx .